<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old Fashioned Sugar Cookies Recipe from Weight Watchers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bfeedme.com/old-fashioned-sugar-cookies-recipe-from-weight-watchers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bfeedme.com/old-fashioned-sugar-cookies-recipe-from-weight-watchers/</link>
	<description>make wise food choices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:52:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: irritated</title>
		<link>http://www.bfeedme.com/old-fashioned-sugar-cookies-recipe-from-weight-watchers/comment-page-1/#comment-41828</link>
		<dc:creator>irritated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfeedme.com/old-fashioned-sugar-cookies-recipe-from-weight-watchers/#comment-41828</guid>
		<description>I find it quite dismaying that someone goes to the trouble to look for a weight watcher recipe  in which a person claims to have one direct from weight watchers, yet there is not nutritional information or points listed! Hello!! Why else would we want this recipe? And this is every grandma&#039;s recipe, especially since it lists just &quot;milk&quot; as an ingredient. Really? Maybe a little specific here, especially since it&#039;s WW. I&#039;m sorry, I&#039;ve been seeing a lot of people posting false info just for website hits and I&#039;m tired of it. 

PO&#039;d.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it quite dismaying that someone goes to the trouble to look for a weight watcher recipe  in which a person claims to have one direct from weight watchers, yet there is not nutritional information or points listed! Hello!! Why else would we want this recipe? And this is every grandma&#8217;s recipe, especially since it lists just &#8220;milk&#8221; as an ingredient. Really? Maybe a little specific here, especially since it&#8217;s WW. I&#8217;m sorry, I&#8217;ve been seeing a lot of people posting false info just for website hits and I&#8217;m tired of it. </p>
<p>PO&#8217;d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://www.bfeedme.com/old-fashioned-sugar-cookies-recipe-from-weight-watchers/comment-page-1/#comment-23514</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfeedme.com/old-fashioned-sugar-cookies-recipe-from-weight-watchers/#comment-23514</guid>
		<description>Do you know the points in each cookie? 

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know the points in each cookie? </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nakisha Matlock</title>
		<link>http://www.bfeedme.com/old-fashioned-sugar-cookies-recipe-from-weight-watchers/comment-page-1/#comment-17418</link>
		<dc:creator>Nakisha Matlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfeedme.com/old-fashioned-sugar-cookies-recipe-from-weight-watchers/#comment-17418</guid>
		<description>these cookies look great</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these cookies look great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
